linux-kernel - Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation,pathname matching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070616162653.GC20990@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jun 2007 09:26:53 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <from-lsm@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and
	manipulation,pathname matching

On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:44:08AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > A daemon using inotify can "instantly"[1] detect this and label the file
> > properly if it shows up.
> 
> > Same daemon can do the re-label.
> 
> Can the daemon using inotify access to all pathnames in all process's
> namespaces?

I don't see why not, do you?

> Are the namespace the daemon has and the namespace of pathnames
> notified via inotify always the same?

If they are in the same namespace, then yes, they will as far as I can
tell.  Do you think this is incorrect?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/