[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706170145.HBG40443.GTtNNPSM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:45:31 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <from-lsm@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: greg@...ah.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading andmanipulation,pathname matching
Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:44:08AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Can the daemon using inotify access to all pathnames in all process's
> > namespaces?
>
> I don't see why not, do you?
>
> > Are the namespace the daemon has and the namespace of pathnames
> > notified via inotify always the same?
>
> If they are in the same namespace, then yes, they will as far as I can
> tell. Do you think this is incorrect?
At least, I think SELinux's "make relabel" can't relabel
files that are not in the namespace of "make" process.
I don't know how to use inotify, but what I worried is ...
If there are cases they are in different namespace,
it is impossible to relabel using userland daemon
(i.e. deferred-relabeling won't work)
unless all pathnames of all namespaces are somehow
accessible via inotify.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists