[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467560CF.6090100@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:26:55 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel?
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> And we should be aware that reverting is only a workaround for the real
>>> problem which lies in our bug handling.
>> ...
>
> And this is something I want to emphasize again.
>
> How can we make any progress with the real problem and not only the
> symptoms?
...
Perhaps make lists of
- bug reports which never lead to any debug activity
(no responsible person/team was found, or a seemingly person/team
did not start to debug the report)
- known regressions on release,
- regressions that became known after release,
- subsystems with notable backlogs of old bugs,
- other categories?
Select typical cases from each categories, analyze what went wrong in
these cases, and try to identify practicable countermeasures.
Another approach: Figure out areas where quality is exemplary and try
to draw conclusions for areas where quality is lacking.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -==- =---=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists