| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0706171555p7ce2419eg2c91f40e22111b0f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:55:30 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> To: "Al Boldi" <a1426z@...ab.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel? On 18/06/07, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Sunday 17 June 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > We of course do want to minimise the amount of overhead for each > > > developer. I'm a strong believer in specialisation: rather than > > > requiring that *every* developer/maintainer integrate new steps in their > > > processes it would be better to allow them to proceed in a > > > close-to-usual fashion and to provide for a specialist person (or team) > > > to do the sorts of things which you're thinking about. > > > > Makes sense... however we need to educate each and every developer about > > importance of the code review and proper recognition of reviewers. > > That's as easy to manage as is currently done with rc-regressions. Are you a volunteer? It's not an easy task, there are more patches than regressions. Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists