[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706180655.47998.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 06:55:47 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel?
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 18/06/07, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> wrote:
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Sunday 17 June 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > We of course do want to minimise the amount of overhead for each
> > > > developer. I'm a strong believer in specialisation: rather than
> > > > requiring that *every* developer/maintainer integrate new steps in
> > > > their processes it would be better to allow them to proceed in a
> > > > close-to-usual fashion and to provide for a specialist person (or
> > > > team) to do the sorts of things which you're thinking about.
> > >
> > > Makes sense... however we need to educate each and every developer
> > > about importance of the code review and proper recognition of
> > > reviewers.
> >
> > That's as easy to manage as is currently done with rc-regressions.
>
> Are you a volunteer?
Probably not, as this task requires a real PRO!
> It's not an easy task, there are more patches than regressions.
I didn't say it was an easy task, and it probably involves a lot of stamina.
But the management aspect looks rather straight forward, yet rewarding.
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists