| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:25:48 +0900 From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> To: Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric@...olt.net, zhenyu.z.wang@...el.com, y-goto@...fujitsu.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:10:49AM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:18:58AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > The obvious question of course is whether actually reverting this > > changeset fixes your problem? I would be very surprised if it did. > > Having a git commit Id, like d09c6b809432668371b5de9102f4f9aa6a7c79cc, > how can I create a .diff file from that? > $ git show d09c6b809432668371b5de9102f4f9aa6a7c79cc | patch -p1 -R ... build and test ... $ git show d09c6b809432668371b5de9102f4f9aa6a7c79cc | patch -p1 ... back to original (or git checkout-index -f mm/page_alloc.c) ... if you just want to test that single change. > I think git bisect made an error... as you can see for yourself > with the list of tested git Id's that I gave - it didn't test > both sides of that patch imho. If you tell me how to extract a patch > then I'll manually unapply it to some failing kernel revisions and > see if that makes a difference. > Assuming that reverting that patch makes no difference, can you provide the output of 'git bisect log'? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists