[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070619082302.4b9a5c27@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:23:02 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>,
Chad Tindel <ctindel@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5?
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:36:30 -0700
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The following patch (based on a patch from Stephen Hemminger
> <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>) removes use after free conditions in
> the unregister path for the bonding master. Without this patch, an
> operation of the form "echo -bond0 > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters"
> would trigger a NULL pointer dereference in sysfs. I was not able to
> induce the failure with the non-sysfs code path, but for consistency I
> updated that code as well.
>
> I also did some testing of the bonding /proc file being open
> while the bond is being deleted, and didn't see any problems there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Hey David, this patch fixes one of the bugs listed in 2.6.22-rc5
list. Jay submitted last week but it hasn't made it upstream.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists