[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070619195944.GA105@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:59:44 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
On 06/19, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > The commited "Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals"
> > (commit caec4e8dc85e0644ec24aeb36285e1ba02da58cc) doesn't implement
> > this.
> >
> > We can do something like
> >
> > int signalfd_dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, sigset_t *mask, siginfo_t *info)
> > {
> > if (tsk->tgid == current->tgid)
> > tsk = current;
> >
> > return dequeue_signal(tsk, mask, info);
> > }
> >
> > (still I can't understand why should we change signalfd).
>
> Yes, of course. I was waiting for Ben's patch to go in, before fixing
> signalfd. I did not know if Linus would have acked that.
OK, this means that signalfd becomes "thread group wide". In that case
I'd suggest to also change sys_signalfd(-1),
- ctx->tsk = current;
+ ctx->tsk = current->group_leader;
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists