[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070619200818.GA122@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:08:18 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
On 06/19, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > On 06/19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:14 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > > The commited "Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals"
> > > > (commit caec4e8dc85e0644ec24aeb36285e1ba02da58cc) doesn't implement
> > > > this.
> > >
> > > Indeed, if you want what Davide described, you need to also change
> > > signalfd side. The patch I did merely prevents another thread from
> > > dequeuing somebody else private signals.
> >
> > Yes I see, but why do we need this change? Yes, we can dequeue SIGSEGV
> > from another thread. Just don't do it if you have a handler for SIGSEGV?
>
> I believe it can be confusing to have private signals dequeued from
> another thread. The kernel expect those to be dequeued by the target
> thread.
Well, I think the kernel doesn't make any assumptions on that. It can't
guarantee the signal will be actually dequeued, to begin with.
(That said, I probably missed something, in that case I'd like to be
educated. This is the real reason why I am making the noise :)
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists