linux-kernel - Re: [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:01:02 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	eranian@....hp.com
Cc:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	levon@...ementarian.org, perfmon@...ali.hpl.hp.com,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net, wcohen@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog


> Once this is fixed (which is what Bjorn did), then I will agree with you.
> For this, the allocator needs to be able to probe the CPU and initialize
> its own data structures.

Ok that sounds reasonable. Please someone send a patch that does only 
that.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/