linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : Debug messages added

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.99.0706201326310.6935@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>
cc:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : Debug messages added

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Stephane Eranian wrote:

> > After commenting on your first set of patches, I've been using it a little 
> > more.  In my use, these debugging messages weren't very helpful because 
> > "pfm_file_ops" can indicate pfm_mmap, pfm_read, pfm_poll, etc.  Could 
> > these be changed to be more specific based on the function they're in?
> > 
> the PFM_DBG() macro adds the CPU, function name and line number to the
> printed string.
> 

That's not the case in what I currently have in my tree, I'll go back and 
see what I'm missing.

What's the current status of the perfmon2 patchset that Robert's work is 
based on?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/