[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070620203944.GB26200@frankl.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:39:44 -0700
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : Debug messages added
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:28:50PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> > > After commenting on your first set of patches, I've been using it a little
> > > more. In my use, these debugging messages weren't very helpful because
> > > "pfm_file_ops" can indicate pfm_mmap, pfm_read, pfm_poll, etc. Could
> > > these be changed to be more specific based on the function they're in?
> > >
> > the PFM_DBG() macro adds the CPU, function name and line number to the
> > printed string.
> >
>
> That's not the case in what I currently have in my tree, I'll go back and
> see what I'm missing.
Bizarre. Becuase if you've disabled CONFIG_PERFMON_DEBUG, then all the PFM_DBG()
are removed.
>
> What's the current status of the perfmon2 patchset that Robert's work is
> based on?
Well, I have been hacking on it a lot especially to allow Oprofile and
perfmon2 to co-exist (mutual-exclusion). I am hoping to release something
before I fly to OLS next week. I have started integrating Robert's patches.
I also have to integrate IBM's Cell support patch.
--
-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists