[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91b13c310706210621n29a2da43lc5caaf14df2bd47b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:21:28 +0800
From: "rae l" <crquan@...il.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: trivial@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization
On 6/19/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Denis Cheng wrote:
> > From: Denis Cheng <crquan@...il.com>
> >
> > the explicit memset call could be optimized out by data initialization,
> > thus all the fill working can be done by the compiler implicitly.
> >
>
> How does the generated code change? Does gcc do something stupid like
> statically allocate a prototype structure full of zeros, and then memcpy
> it in? Or does it generate a series of explicit assignments for each
> member? Or does it generate a memset anyway?
>
> Seems to me that this gives gcc the opportunity to be more stupid, and
> the only right answer is what we're doing anyway.
>
> J
>
Technically speaking, C standard guarantees the data be initialized correctly;
just from the point view of code style, let the compiler selects how
to initialize will be better, this could let the compiler has more
optimization points.
--
Denis Cheng
Linux Application Developer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists