[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070621132008.GE18392@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:20:08 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Stefan Seyfried <seife@...e.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suspend-devel List <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH, 3rd try] make disable_console_suspend runtime configurable
Hi!
> > > Sorry for not screaming when CONFIG_DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND went in,
> > > but please lets solve this correctly....
> >
> > Ouch and sorry for not screaming at "try 1" time. But it still does
> > not make the patch right, and I believe that even patch authors agree
> > that "no-config-needed" is superior solution.
>
> No, i don't agree at all.
>
> In this case, "no config needed" == "not possible to debug suspend
> problems".
No, sorry.
My proposed solution is "figure out which console drivers can survive
being on while machines go down, and keep them on".
So, "no config needed" == "kernel always does the right thing, keeping
console during suspend when possible" == "possible to debug suspend
problems without having to change CONFIG_ or /sys/*".
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists