[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070621211419.GD31090@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:14:19 +0200
From: Stefan Seyfried <seife@...e.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suspend-devel List <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH, 3rd try] make disable_console_suspend runtime configurable
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:20:08PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > No, i don't agree at all.
> >
> > In this case, "no config needed" == "not possible to debug suspend
> > problems".
>
> No, sorry.
>
> My proposed solution is "figure out which console drivers can survive
> being on while machines go down, and keep them on".
>
> So, "no config needed" == "kernel always does the right thing, keeping
> console during suspend when possible" == "possible to debug suspend
> problems without having to change CONFIG_ or /sys/*".
Ok. Deal. Once you fixed all the console drivers, i'll gladly send a patch
that reverts the patch we are discussing now.
Note that this patch actually helps fixing those drivers, since you can
test much easier if a given driver survives suspend ;-)
--
Stefan Seyfried
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers:
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists