linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 008 of 8] knfsd: nfsd4: don't delegate files that have had conflicts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070621163330.GE4094@fieldses.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:33:30 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	meelap@...ch.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 008 of 8] knfsd: nfsd4: don't delegate files that have had conflicts

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:28:01PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> The authorship information got lost on these last two patches--both were
> originally by Meelap Shah <meelap@...ch.edu>.
> 
> (The problem may have been that I had a From: line for him but not a
> Signed-off-by: line?)

Hm, no, actually I think the same happened to patch 1 (from Marc Eshel)
and 4 (from Benny Halevy), neither which had missing signed-off-by's, so
probably your scripts have always ignored From: lines in the body of an
email, and I only just now noticed?

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/