[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211344500.31603@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
cc: Andrew McKay <amckay@...rs.ca>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2007, david@...g.hm wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> If it's input-only, then you can't possibly harm the operation of the
>>> network by only listening in, can you?
>
>> Ok, so you consider any anti-piracy measures to be something that
>> GPLv3 should prohibit.
>
> In general, I object to the use of my code in ways that don't permit
> users to run it for any purpose, study it, adapt it to suit their own
> needs, modify the code and distribute it, modified or not.
>
> If this means my code can't be used to implement DRM, that's a good
> thing.
>
> All anti-piracy measures I've ever known deprive users of legitimate
> rights too. So, yes, I don't agree with these measures.
>
> I believe in punishing the guilty, not in punishing innocent
> bystanders just such that the guilty have to find work arounds to
> become guilty.
this is your right with your code. please stop browbeating people who
disagree with you.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists