[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211719280.31603@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
cc: Andrew McKay <amckay@...rs.ca>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2007, david@...g.hm wrote:
>
>> this is your right with your code. please stop browbeating people who
>> disagree with you.
>
> For the record, GPLv2 is already meant to accomplish this. I don't
> understand why people who disagree with this stance chose GPLv2.
> Isn't "no further restrictions" clear enough?
everyone else is reading this as 'no further license restrictions' not 'no
hardware restrictions' becouse GPLv2 explicitly says that it has nothing
to do with running the software, only with distributing it.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists