[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182520692.5493.51.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:58:12 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, matthew.wilcox@...com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] Split out tasklets from softirq.c
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:45 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2007/6/22, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
>
> > +static inline void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> > +{
> > + while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state)) { barrier(); }
> > +}
>
> BTW, can we use cpu_relax() instead of barrier() in this busy-wait loop?
>
Probably, but not in this patch series. That's part of the code I'm
trying to remove ;-)
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists