[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070623095153.279c1194.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:51:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tony Jones <tonyj@...e.de>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] audit: fix oops removing watch if audit disabled
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:38:20 -0700 Tony Jones <tonyj@...e.de> wrote:
> Removing a watched file will oops if audit is disabled (auditctl -e 0).
>
> To reproduce:
> - auditctl -e 1
> - touch /tmp/foo
> - auditctl -w /tmp/foo
> - auditctl -e 0
> - rm /tmp/foo (or mv)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Jones <tonyj@...e.de>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 74cc0fc..ce61f42 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static void audit_update_watch(struct au
>
> /* If the update involves invalidating rules, do the inode-based
> * filtering now, so we don't omit records. */
> - if (invalidating &&
> + if (invalidating && current->audit_context &&
> audit_filter_inodes(current, current->audit_context) == AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT)
> audit_set_auditable(current->audit_context);
This looks like 2.6.22 material to me.
Question is: is it also 2.6.21.x material?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists