linux-kernel - Re: How innovative is Linux?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <467D58C2.6010909@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:00:42 +0530
From:	jimmy bahuleyan <knight.camelot@...il.com>
To:	Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
CC:	Grozdan Nikolov <microchip@...llo.be>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How innovative is Linux?

Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2007, you wrote:
> 
>> hmm, wasn't loadable kernel modules first implemented in SunOS 4.x [...]
> Yes, but that was pretty cumbersome. You had to resolve the symbols in user 
> space, using a hopefully matching /vmunix. Linux was first to feature an 
> in-kernel linker and symbol table, IIRC.
> 

building upon or improving existing technology is as important as
inventing new things. if every one insisted on dreaming up new things, i
doubt we would've accomplished anything significant (not just in OS,
anywhere ;)

> 	Torsten

-jb
-- 
Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/