lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:09:53 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 03/10] Allow userspace applications to use marker.h to parse the markers section in the kernel binary. On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:14:25PM -0500, David Smith wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >NACK. This shouldn't be includedable from userspace and systemtap people > >should stop doing crap like that but use kernel infrastructure everyone > >else uses including runtime kernel code instead of stuffin all kinds of > >crap into their broken translator. > > Christoph, > > I was using the above information to parse all the available markers in > a kernel, but I believe I've found a way where I don't need the marker.h > header, so I'm OK with your NACK. > > Out of curiosity, what is the kernel infrastructure you believe I should > be using to get a list of all available markers in a kernel? Note that > I also have a requirement to get a list of all available markers in a > kernel that isn't the currently running one. None. Modules using markers should ship with the kernel or be written on deman and not beeing created by some unreliable parser. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists