[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070623102515.3a1fc583@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:25:15 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 03/10] Allow userspace applications to use marker.h to
parse the markers section in the kernel binary.
O> > Out of curiosity, what is the kernel infrastructure you believe I should
> > be using to get a list of all available markers in a kernel? Note that
> > I also have a requirement to get a list of all available markers in a
> > kernel that isn't the currently running one.
>
> None. Modules using markers should ship with the kernel or be written
> on deman and not beeing created by some unreliable parser.
And what do you think should happen in the real world instead of
Christoph fantasy land ?
Getting the marker exports right is what is needed to avoid having an
unreliable parser and ending up with a reliable one.
Or would you rather someone loaded a JVM into kernel space so it was
"shipped with the kernel"
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists