[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070624020405.78bjajayowkw000k@imap.suse.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:04:05 +0200
From: Andreas Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 26/28] x86-64 block irq balancing for timer
Am Sat 23 Jun 2007 11:27:20 PM CEST schrieb Arjan van de Ven
<arjan@...radead.org>:
> On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:32 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> plain text document attachment
>> (x86-64-clockevents-irq-balancing.patch)
>> From: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
>>
>> Disable irq balancing on IRQ0.
>
>
> this patch is missing some rationale....
Several SIS chipsets lock up when you try to change affinity of IRQ #0
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists