[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182648015.2626.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:20:14 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 26/28] x86-64 block irq balancing for timer
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 02:04 +0200, Andreas Kleen wrote:
> Am Sat 23 Jun 2007 11:27:20 PM CEST schrieb Arjan van de Ven
> <arjan@...radead.org>:
>
> > On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:32 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> plain text document attachment
> >> (x86-64-clockevents-irq-balancing.patch)
> >> From: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> >>
> >> Disable irq balancing on IRQ0.
> >
> >
> > this patch is missing some rationale....
>
> Several SIS chipsets lock up when you try to change affinity of IRQ #0
so we're protecting root against himself.. fair enough.
probably wants a comment in the code
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists