[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h8xa8iaee.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:41:29 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Nobin Mathew" <nobin.mathew@...il.com>,
"Carlo Wood" <carlo@...noe.com>,
"Tomasz Kłoczko" <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
At Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:06:18 +0100,
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > If it is native ALSA driver then it will restart after each underrun
> > and overrun. It is the applications job to do this, alsa-lib provides
> > all support for this. I have no idea of OSS and OSS emulation in ALSA.
>
> OSS should autorestart on underrun and just moan about overruns and drop
> bits. So if it's not following that behaviour he is IMHO correct for the
> OSS emulation case.
I think he is right in the case of read (although I don't remember his
post as my buffer overran). The playback is automaically reset and
restarted at underrun.
But, the patch there is wrong. It should handle -EPIPE, which means
XRUN, while -ESTRPIPE means the suspend state.
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists