linux-kernel - Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706251243490.11964@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:46:45 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>
cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?

On Jun 25 2007 12:06, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 24 2007 21:24, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> > Try to answer on question "ALSA or OSS ?" using *only* technical arguments.
>>
>> Ok: The OSS cs46xx driver did not support the rear 2 channels.
>
> Yes it is true .. OSS (Hannu tree) dos not provide rear 2 channels in
> cs46xx driver because .. in this OSS tree there is no cs46xx driver :>

I think that says it all why ALSA should be kept.

	Jan
--