[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706250642050.3880@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:43:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: [PATCH] X86: Update alignment when 4K stacks are used.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com>
---
it's not clear from MAINTAINERS who's responsible for something this
generic.
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c b/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
index d2daf67..504f134 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
@@ -149,15 +149,11 @@ fastcall unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
-/*
- * These should really be __section__(".bss.page_aligned") as well, but
- * gcc's 3.0 and earlier don't handle that correctly.
- */
static char softirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE]
- __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE)));
+ __attribute__((__section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
static char hardirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE]
- __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE)));
+ __attribute__((__section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
/*
* allocate per-cpu stacks for hardirq and for softirq processing
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists