[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070625130620.GB5118@atjola.homenet>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:06:20 +0200
From: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch, 2.6.22-rc6] fix nmi_watchdog=2 bootup hang
On 2007.06.25 08:49:05 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> >On 2007.06.25 10:26:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >>* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>the winner is ...
> >>>
> >>> f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8 is first bad commit
> >>> commit f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8
> >>> Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
> >>> Date: Wed May 2 19:27:14 2007 +0200
> >>>
> >>> [PATCH] i386: PARAVIRT: Consistently wrap paravirt ops callsites to
> >>> make them patchable
> >>>
> >>and of course i'm happy to test any patch that is simpler than the
> >>brutal revert i sent.
> >>
> >
> >wrmsrl() looks broken, dropping the upper 32bits of the value to be
> >written. Does this help?
> >
>
> Crap. That's embarrassing. Does it help, because it seems likely?
> (Esp since Ingo didn't even have CONFIG_PARAVIRT enabled, so most of his
> revert would have been dead code anyway.)
He has. The config Ingo sent was for x86_64, which (AFAICT) doesn't have
CONFIG_PARAVIRT, so the config was unfortunately useless. But his
bootlog tells us:
Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware
Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists