[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467fd9f3.Vc25RVyWdnB9qPjQ%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:06:27 +0200
From: Joerg.Schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling)
To: david@...g.hm, arnd@...db.de
Cc: vapier.adi@...il.com, schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel include files
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2007, david@...g.hm wrote:
> > this has been discussed many times and the answer is that the kernel is
> > not gong to change it's side of things to ANSI C.
>
> I don't think that's entirely true with regard to the include files.
> We have always tried not to step on anyone's toes there, e.g. regarding
> the use of __u32 vs. uint32_t style types. It's certainly desirable
> to make the kernel headers that are _meant_ for inclusion compatible
> with standard compilers.
>
> Mike Frysinger has posted a few patches that make the installed headers
> friendlier to strict C99 users. While there was some negative feedback
> about these patches, it was not about the idea of making the installed
> headers C99 clean, but rather about the question whether those non-clean
> parts should be exported in the first place.
Wouldn't it be simpler to ask the developers to deliver their include files
in a state that is clean for user space programs?
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@...ily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@...tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists