[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <409527.74718.qm@web36609.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andrew Morgan <agm@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
--- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
> > I think the value is overrated. You would never want to do that
> > in a production environment, and in a debug environment you could
> > just as easily reboot and get some start-up testing out of the way.
>
> And in a development environment you can just as easily select
> CONFIG_XYZ=y, no?
>
> So we have two options, one which provides greater choice and
> flexibility.
I have no problem with leaving things the way they are today,
and none with the proposed change. Either way works for me. It
would be a little bit better for me if it stayed as is, but that's
not a coding issue.
Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists