linux-kernel - Re: How innovative is Linux?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:42:24 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
cc:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Grozdan Nikolov <microchip@...llo.be>,
	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How innovative is Linux?


On Jun 25 2007 09:37, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jun 25 2007 11:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> >
>> >It is also quite likely the reply was written before reading the other
>> >comments.  With the volume on lkml, reading all comments in a thread
>> >before writing any replies is just not possible.
>> 
>> Perhaps the list needs to be split up, e.g. linux-politics@...r :)
>
>I'm for that (including a place for GPL discussions), but I think that
>people would still just overload lkml instead of using the split lists.

Then turn it around: the technical part becomes a separate list. Sort of like
netfilter and netfilter-devel.


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/