| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <46800090.7020402@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:21:12 +0530 From: jimmy bahuleyan <knight.camelot@...il.com> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>, Grozdan Nikolov <microchip@...llo.be>, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: How innovative is Linux? Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jun 25 2007 09:37, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> On Jun 25 2007 11:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >>>> It is also quite likely the reply was written before reading the other >>>> comments. With the volume on lkml, reading all comments in a thread >>>> before writing any replies is just not possible. >>> Perhaps the list needs to be split up, e.g. linux-politics@...r :) >> I'm for that (including a place for GPL discussions), but I think that >> people would still just overload lkml instead of using the split lists. > > Then turn it around: the technical part becomes a separate list. Sort of like > netfilter and netfilter-devel. > > > Jan would be quite difficult in practice, since people would then argue that their mails were in fact technical ;) -jb -- Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists