| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200706252136.18366.ak@suse.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:36:17 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>, eranian@....hp.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, levon@...ementarian.org, perfmon@...ali.hpl.hp.com, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net, wcohen@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog On Monday 25 June 2007 21:09, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:34:48 +0200 > > Bj__rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de> wrote: > > The performance counter allocator relies on the nmi watchdog being > > probed, so we have to do that even if the watchdog is not enabled. > > So... what's the status of this lot? > > I've just merged this patch and the second one: > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel > PerfMon NMI watchdog Message-ID: <20070620183551.GC3251@...ola.homenet> > > but there was no followup discussion afaict. > > Andi, Stephane: acks? Yes, although I'm still a little uneasy about the always probe one. > If acked, do we agree that this is 2.6.22 material? The first (always probe) is probably .22 material, but needs more testing first. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists