[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070626002131.ff3518d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:21:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slob: poor man's NUMA support.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:06:16 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> This adds preliminary NUMA support to SLOB, primarily aimed at systems
> with small nodes (tested all the way down to a 128kB SRAM block), whether
> asymmetric or otherwise.
>
> We follow the same conventions as SLAB/SLUB, preferring current node
> placement for new pages, or with explicit placement, if a node has been
> specified. Presently on UP NUMA this has the side-effect of preferring
> node#0 allocations (since numa_node_id() == 0, though this could be
> reworked if we could hand off a pfn to determine node placement), so
> single-CPU NUMA systems will want to place smaller nodes further out in
> terms of node id. Once a page has been bound to a node (via explicit
> node id typing), we only do block allocations from partial free pages
> that have a matching node id in the page flags.
>
> The current implementation does have some scalability problems, in that
> all partial free pages are tracked in the global freelist (with
> contention due to the single spinlock). However, these are things that
> are being reworked for SMP scalability first, while things like per-node
> freelists can easily be built on top of this sort of functionality once
> it's been added.
>
> More background can be found in:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118117916022379&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118170446306199&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118187859420048&w=2
>
> and subsequent threads.
>
> ...
>
> +static void *slob_new_page(gfp_t gfp, int order, int node)
> +{
> + void *page;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + if (node != -1)
> + page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp, order);
> + else
> +#endif
> + page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
Isn't the above equivalent to a bare
page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp, order);
?
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return page_address(page);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Allocate a slob block within a given slob_page sp.
> */
> @@ -258,7 +290,7 @@ static void *slob_page_alloc(struct slob_page *sp, size_t size, int align)
> /*
> * slob_alloc: entry point into the slob allocator.
> */
> -static void *slob_alloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int align)
> +static void *slob_alloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int align, int node)
> {
> struct slob_page *sp;
> slob_t *b = NULL;
> @@ -267,6 +299,15 @@ static void *slob_alloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int align)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&slob_lock, flags);
> /* Iterate through each partially free page, try to find room */
> list_for_each_entry(sp, &free_slob_pages, list) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + /*
> + * If there's a node specification, search for a partial
> + * page with a matching node id in the freelist.
> + */
> + if (node != -1 && page_to_nid(&sp->page) != node)
Other code does
if (node < 0
rather than comparing with -1 exactly.
On many CPUs it'll save a few bytes of code.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists