| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ormyyn40o9.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:47:34 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@....ic.unicamp.br> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3? On Jun 26, 2007, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@....ic.unicamp.br> wrote: > On Jun 26, 2007, Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu> wrote: >> You could argue that they do not restrict copying, distribution >> and modification of the sources in general, only of the specific copy >> they distribute. > "We don't oppose that you do any of these things, once you get the > source code. We just make it difficult (hopefully impossible) that > you'll get to the source code in the first place." Actually, they could even claim you don't need the source code to make modifications. The license even says the source code is the most convenient form to make modifications, not the only form. Now, that the others suck rocks is not their fault, is it? ;-) -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists