[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706270034560.6551@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: long-term regression
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:56:17 -0700 (PDT) david@...g.hm wrote:
>
>> due to the size the files are posted at http://linux.lang.hm/linux
>>
>> let me know what else I can send to help.
>>
>> David Lang
>
>
> I suggest that you test 2.6.22-rcN using one or both of these
> boot options:
>
> noisapnp
> pnpacpi=off
>
> Somewhere between 2.6.18 and 2.6.22-development, the ACPI config
> symbol also starting enabling (selecting) PNP. That's one of many
> differences....
with the 2.6.22-rc4 kernel that I was useing earlier, adding these two
options clears up the problem. Thanks.
should I test the two individually? or just plan on useing both from now
on?
I normally disable PnP (both ISA and PCI), should I leave it enabled with
the newer kernels and this motherboard?
>
> I would also disable CONFIG_USB_USS720, at least for testing.
for ease of testing (I got time to reboot the box around midnight) I used
the same config as before, so this is still on.
David Lang
>
>> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:40:28 -0700
>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>>> To: david@...g.hm
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
>>> linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
>>> Subject: Re: long-term regression
>>>
>>> david@...g.hm wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:36:59 -0700
>>>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>>>>> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>>>> Cc: david@...g.hm, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
>>>>> linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
>>>>> Subject: Re: long-term regression
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:28:07 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT) david@...g.hm wrote:
>>>>>>> I haven't had time to bisect this, but I'm having a problem on a
>>>>>>> AMD64
>>>>>>> gentoo system where the printer doesn't work with recent kernels.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2.6.18-rc3 worked
>>>>>>> 2.6.21.1 doesn't
>>>>>>> 2.6.22-rc4 doesn't
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> unfortunantly the system is gooted on 2.6.18 at the moment and I'm
>>>>>>> out of
>>>>>>> town so my ability to test is limited I can provide the 2.6.22-rc4
>>>>>>> (attached) and 2.6.18-rc3 configs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dmesg appears to show the port being detected, but writes to the
>>>>>>> port
>>>>>>> under newer kernels appear to complete, but no data gets to the
>>>>>>> printer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> any suggestions other then doing the large bisect?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That would be good, thanks. Please be sure to cc linux-usb-devel on
>>>>>> the results.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, I'm curious about how someone deduced that this is a problem
>>>>> with a USB printer vs. parallel port printer since the config file has:
>>>>>
>>>>> CONFIG_PRINTER=y
>>>>> CONFIG_USB_PRINTER=y
>>>>>
>>>>> The kernel boot log should probably be posted also.
>>>>
>>>> here is the dmesg from 2.6.22-rc4 and kern.log showing 2.6.22.-rc4 and
>>>> 2.6.180rc3
>>>>
>>>> the printer not working is the parallel port.
>>>
>>> This email didn't show up on lkml or linux-usb-devel due to size limits (it
>>> was 900+ KB).
>>>
>>> David, please send your working 2.6.18 config file.
>>>
>>> Can you post the kernel log files on the web somewhere?
>
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists