[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706271458.51884.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:58:51 +0200
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw_random: add quality categories
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 04:00:46 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 June 2007 16:06:25 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > Which, AFAIK, we can quantify as the minimum expected entropy in the output.
> >
> > The category is _not_ a measure of the entropy in the output.
> > It is _just_ to get the chance to get a sane _default_ policy
> > for which RNG is enabled by default, in the kernel.
> > It's just about a default policy. _Nothing_ else.
>
> Then why don't you call it "preference", or something to that effect?
Why? Because I did not get the same idea as you?
So, please make up "preference" categories and give me some examples.
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists