[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070627125958.GA16758@daikokuya.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:59:58 +0900
From: Neil Booth <neil@...kokuya.co.uk>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
Al Viro wrote:-
> If you want to test ICE recognition, right now only the following places
> are checking for it:
> * bitfield width
> * __attribute__((aligned(<number>)))
> * __attribute__((address_space(<number>)))
> * [<index>] in designators within initializer list
> * [<index> ... <index>] - ditto, gccism
>
> That's it. We can use it elsewhere too, but that's a separate bunch of
> patches (trivial to do now).
Bah. You don't escape that easily :)
extern int a;
struct b { unsigned int b1:(1,2); };
struct c { unsigned int c1: 1 ? 2: a++; };
are both invalid yet undiagnosed.
Neil.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists