lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:35:46 +0900 From: Neil Booth <neil@...kokuya.co.uk> To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>, Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions Al Viro wrote:- > > Son of a... expand_comma() cannibalizes the node, should restore ->flags > to 0 (same as other similar suckers). > > > struct c { unsigned int c1: 1 ? 2: a++; }; > > Ditto for expand_conditional, but there we should preserve the original > ->flags instead - might be non-zero and we ought to do that after > expanding the taken branch... > > From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:10:54 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] fix the missed cannibalizing simplifications > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Now I think I only see one class of issues; the following is valid C99 (I believe that's what you intend to follow) but being rejected: struct a { int comma: 1 ? 2: (2, 3); }; It's invalid C90. Neil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists