lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070628163736.GA525@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:37:36 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues

On 06/28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> I also don't see any nice API to have the priority set for a workqueue
> thread from within the kernel. Looks like one needs to be added,
> otherwise, I need to have the wrapper dig into the workqueue structs to
> find the thread that handles the workqueue.

It is not so trivial to implement properly. Note that CPU_UP creates a new
cwq->thread, so somehow workqueue should "remember" its priority. This means
we should record it in workqueue_struct. The most simple way is to add yet
another parameter to __create_workqueue(), but this is nasty.

So, perhaps we should add "long nice" to "struct workqueue_struct", and then

	void set_workqueue_nice(struct workqueue_struct *wq, long nice)
	{
		const cpumask_t *cpu_map = wq_cpu_map(wq);
		struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
		int cpu;

		wq->nice = nice;

		mutex_lock(&workqueue_mutex);

		for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpu_map) {
			cwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu);
			if (cwq->thread)
				set_user_nice(cwq->thread, nice);
		}

		mutex_unlock(&workqueue_mutex);
	}

We could use for_each_cpu_online() instead, but then we should check
is_single_threaded().

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ