[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706280230.42515.ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:30:42 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, david@...g.hm,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Userspace compiler support of "long long"
On Thursday 28 June 2007 00:30:52 Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2007, at 13:32:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > AFAIR the Intel compiler claims to be gcc.
> >
> > But these are by far not the only C compilers under Linux, and the
> > more important points are:
> >
> > Is there any userspace Linux compiler that does not support "long
> > long"?
>
> Don't know, but I'd guess not.
Tendra C and probably lcc. I would guess tinycc too.
> The only trick is if you care about building 32-bit compat code using
> 64-bit linux kernel headers. In that case we should probably just
> make all archs use "long long" for their 64-bit integers, unless
> there's some platform I'm not remembering where "long long" is 128-
> bits or bigger. The other benefit is that people could then just use
> the printf format "%llu" for 64-bit integers instead of having to
> conditionalize it all over the place.
>
> I'm working on a patch now.
Changing this will give you a zillion warnings for printk formats.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists