linux-kernel - Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070627.173416.10133360.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc:	crispin@...ell.com, seanlkml@...patico.ca, bunk@...sta.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jjohansen@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:27:17 -0700 (PDT)

> --- David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> > Neither of those are reasons why something should go into the tree.
> 
> They reflect the corporate reality of the open source community.
> If you're going to go down the "open source isn't for money"
> rathole please take it elsewhere. I've heard the arguments so many
> times I can sing them to the tune of "Lady Madonna".

That's a wonderful technical reason for apparmour to go into the tree.
Thanks for sharing and making it even clearer what is really behind
this submission.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/