[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46854B29.80906@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rodrigo Luiz <troops.of.doom@...il.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...e.cz>,
Ben Collins <bcollins@...ntu.com>,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
"Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@...esys.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Rodney Gordon II <meff@...erevision.org>
Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
Alan Cox wrote:
>>> I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ
>>> storm
>> Why does the driver report "irq 0"?
>>
>> ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd <blah> ctl <blah> bmdma <blah> irq 0 <====
>>
>> Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20
>
> Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ
> values wrongly ?
AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it
remains broken...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists