[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46849948.7010907@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:31:52 -0400
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ian Molton <spyro@....com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...log.com>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@....nec.co.jp>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> No, it's because the bootwrapper is not part of the kernel and does
> not use kernel headers. The aim is that the bootwrapper can be built
> and used outside the kernel source tree, so it needs its own copies of
> any headers that aren't in /usr/include.
>
Hm, I see. But <elf.h> is generally available, isn't it?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists