linux-kernel - Re: [OT] Re: Linux Kernel include files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200706301456.48111.dhazelton@enter.net>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:56:47 -0400
From:	Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
To:	Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de>
Cc:	w@....eu, schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, harald@...gtun.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux Kernel include files

On Saturday 30 June 2007 08:02:16 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> > Jörg,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:27 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > > > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting
> > > > > > In-Reply-To: and References: headers, which RFC2822 says you
> > > > > > SHOULD include in replies.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite.
> > > >
> > > > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not
> > > > have noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and
> > > > if you care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not
> > > > _obliged_ to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know.
> > >
> > > Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving.
> > > Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason.
> >
> > Attacking people who suggest to you they *may* have noticed an anomaly is
> > not polite at all, childish at best, and counter-productive in any case.
>
> Well, then please write this to the person who did attack me for no reason!
>
> What he did is typical trollish behavior, as he tried to turn a technical
> based discussion into a flame war for no reason.
>
> Jörg

Jörg - I see no attack. What I do see is a quite friendly notification that 
your mail program appears to be omitting those headers in certain mails and 
that such action is in violation of a published standard.

Your response was inflammatory, rude and very trollish. And when the person 
calmly restated himself and the reason he made the original comment you again 
responded in an extremely unpleasant manner.

When notified that your behavior was incorrect you pointed fingers and 
yelled "He started it!" - something that *CHILDREN* do.

Since it appears that you act like a child its time to add you to my killfile 
again.

DRH

-- 
Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/