| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <863e9df20707020154o5232e44ch37dd55811c377a8f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:24:44 +0530 From: "Abhishek Sagar" <sagar.abhishek@...il.com> To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, systemtap@...rces.redhat.com Subject: Re: instrumentation and kprobes really still "EXPERIMENTAL"? On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote: > isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore? That would vary from arch to arch. > in addition, while most of the KPROBES config options depend on > > KALLSYMS && EXPERIMENTAL && MODULES > > the s390 architecture depends only on > > EXPERIMENTAL && MODULES > > and its instrumentation support is *not* listed as experimental. > > also, the avr32 entry is in the file Kconfig.debug, and depends only > on DEBUG_KERNEL. just an observation. This probably stems from the episodic growth kprobes across different archs. It can be cleaned up I suppose. -- Abhishek Sagar P.S: Adding systemtap in CC. - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists