| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707020512320.26135@localhost.localdomain> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 05:14:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> To: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com> cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, systemtap@...rces.redhat.com Subject: Re: instrumentation and kprobes really still "EXPERIMENTAL"? On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Abhishek Sagar wrote: > On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote: > > isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore? > > That would vary from arch to arch. fair enough. however, at the very least, i'm thinking that the entire "Instrumentation support" submenu can be made non-EXPERIMENTAL, while individual entries therein can be EXPERIMENTAL on a choice-by-choice basis or something like that. anyway, others are welcome to play with that as they see fit. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists