linux-kernel - Re: [-mm patch] unionfs: make functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:42:49 -0400
From:	Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ezk@...sunysb.edu,
	jsipek@...sunysb.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	unionfs@...esystems.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] unionfs: make functions static

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch makes some needlessly global functions static.
> 
...
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/fs/unionfs/lookup.c.old	2007-07-01 00:05:02.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/fs/unionfs/lookup.c	2007-07-01 00:06:05.000000000 +0200
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  
>  #include "union.h"
>  
> +static int realloc_dentry_private_data(struct dentry *dentry);
> +
>  /* is the filename valid == !(whiteout for a file or opaque dir marker) */

I forget who said it, but someone wasn't very happy with prototypes like
that in .c files. What's the prefered way - are they ok for static symbols?

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

-- 
We have joy, we have fun, we have Linux on a Sun...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/