linux-kernel - Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1I5htd-0000ix-SE@be1.lrz>
Date:	Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:54:21 +0200
From:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default?

Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:

>   just built a new kernel and didn't notice that support for LVM
> wasn't selected by default for x86.  given what i thought was fairly
> widespread use of LVM2, wouldn't it make sense to have this option as
> part of the default config?

If you don't know about LVM, you don't need it. Do you?
-- 
It's redundant! It's redundant! 

Friß, Spammer: er0q@....7eggert.dyndns.org rfgnH@....Gv.7eggert.dyndns.org
 Vmvwh@...jBn.7eggert.dyndns.org sMezxCpya7@...7eggert.dyndns.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/