| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:54:21 +0200 From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de> To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default? Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote: > just built a new kernel and didn't notice that support for LVM > wasn't selected by default for x86. given what i thought was fairly > widespread use of LVM2, wouldn't it make sense to have this option as > part of the default config? If you don't know about LVM, you don't need it. Do you? -- It's redundant! It's redundant! Friß, Spammer: er0q@....7eggert.dyndns.org rfgnH@....Gv.7eggert.dyndns.org Vmvwh@...jBn.7eggert.dyndns.org sMezxCpya7@...7eggert.dyndns.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists